A tacs ix vs multicam reddit Unsure if it’s just unlicensed production or what. In this article, we’ll compare A-TACS and Multicam in detail. Only 1 person in the thread even mentioned A-TACS, u/Lonegunner1898. Nov 25, 2012 · To the OP to answer your specific question I would say multicam would be your best bet for a universal pattern because it works well in a larger variety of environments. Atacs is a little hard to find stuff for while multicam is everywhere. A-TACS iX — Disrupts well and is excellent on rocks but lacks the colour palette to compete with greener forest camos universally. A-TACS is a fractal-based camouflage pattern developed by Digital Concealment Systems in 2009. pattern I give ATACS about a full point of improvement. Jul 13, 2012 · MultiCam combat gear has been considered the most effective camouflage pattern for a very long time but A-TACS is making some waves. Aug 23, 2012 · I have both, like both. For normal wear, I would choose the basic ATACs kit. 2K subscribers in the myogtacticalgear community. FGX is much greener than FG, which is somewhere in between FGX and iX. Apr 27, 2016 · ATACS iX is a relatively new transitional camo pattern beginning to turn up with increasing frequency. Reply reply. By the end, you’ll know which pattern is better suited for your needs. true ATACS which is green dominant and blends all the way through. The ATACS iX “Intermediate Extreme” pattern camouflage has been around for a few months now and has been appearing with increasing frequency in the product line-up of tactical manufacturers. Everyone here runs tan or multicam but atacs is where it’s at. There are also pretty 1:1 copies of ATACS FG itself I have seen listed as “Ataka” or something along those lines. Oct 12, 2011 · A-TACS does have less sharpness to it. I want it for a year round camo for a woodland environment. Out here both work pretty well but at dusk the ATACs works a lot better. Those that made don’t want to have the bad publicity. We’ll look at their designs, performance, applications, and key differences. We tried it recently in Maryland and Arizona. I like the look of both and know that multicam works good in lots of places and Atacs ix works good lots of places too. iX is like a transitional tiger stripe and works pretty good even in the woodlands. Also, I do have to admit, not being the 349825672983rd person jumping on the multicam train would be nice. Problem is that Crye and Spiritus do not make A-TACS FG gear. U-Con camo looks like a multicam copy. This community is a place for people to share the projects they make related to tactical gear and… It’s used and made a lot by Russians. Thanks! If you're in a desert environment, coyote or multicam can work, transitional is where multicam shines. Of course, you’ve heard the news recently. The A-TACS iX [Intermediate Xtreme] works really well in Arizona. Here's a tip: When standing, an A-TACS iX top matches well with bushes and trees, while MultiCam matches the ground really well, so wearing MultiCam pants is a really good idea. Wouldn't compare that to iX really. The greener atacs is awesome. Which leaves, Looks like a smudgier multicam. According to this map, A-TACS FG should be the best camo for my area, and I agree, so I'll be getting clothing in A-TACS FG. Of those, A-TACS iX disrupts well and is excellent on rocks but lacks the colour palette to compete with greener forest camos universally. A-TACS FG-X — My #1. The Russian atacs/green moss is usually too brown for my taste, and as you say gives it a MC bird shit vibe. Multicam is just really effective in many areas. I don't think most people would spot the difference between this and multicam at more than 15m. A-TACS FG has the tan-olive mix to blend on sand and tan mud but is too bright, too saturated, and disruption is average. Unfortunately the coloration of Multicam beats out A-TACS in terms of all season multi terrain advantage in my opinion. maybe even better than a matching set of either, in most cases. Personally I think Multicam Tropic would pair better, but curious to see others' opinions on the matter. AU and AUX are pretty close to eachother I think, don't know how they decided to have both patterns. A-TACS FG — Has the tan-olive mix to blend on sand and tan mud but is too bright, too saturated, and disruption is average. The pattern of the Multicam is a bit more sharp and in my opinion just pattern vs. There are going to be better patterns for specific environments but mutlicam will preform well over a range of environments. In this video we take a look at how each of these patterns I’m having trouble deciding between multicam and Atacs ix. Even though the ground isn’t green here, there’s still a ton green foliage (palo verde trees) which makes coyote tan stand out. Typically Moss tends to be more tan dominant with dark and light green splotches vs. But multicam can be an effective woodland pattern, but at the same time, you could very well use ranger green in woodland and be fine. Looks cool but I doubt it being noticably better than multicam is anything other than marketing. Agreed - At the risk of sounding like a hipster, it's just not cool once everyone's doing it! I think the ATACS - UCON is a good way of getting multicam-like performance without being Multicam. 5. My multicam is a combat suit, which I like because of the padding and re-enforced areas. bteuk lpbnk jhy iajgq ygccos iqvg cawfbq onklnu ixkkx lpt

• Info Nonton Film Red One 2024 Sub Indo Full Movie
• Sinopsis Keseluruhan Film Terbaru “Red One”